Graph-Based Drug–Peptide Recommendation for Discovering Novel Therapeutic Strategies against Age-Related Diseases

Authors

  • Marcus Woodard Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA. Author
  • Alessandra Verdone School of Computing, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA. Author

Keywords:

graph learning; drug repurposing; peptide therapeutics; aging; recommender systems; biomedical knowledge graphs; health governance

Abstract

Age-related diseases are increasingly understood as interconnected manifestations of biological aging rather than isolated clinical entities, creating a need for therapeutic discovery strategies that can reason across drugs, peptides, proteins, pathways, and phenotypes. This paper examines graph-based drug–peptide recommendation as a socio-technical infrastructure for discovering novel therapeutic strategies against age-related diseases. It argues that graph learning can expand the search space beyond conventional small-molecule repurposing by representing peptides as first-class therapeutic entities with distinct pharmacokinetic, manufacturing, and regulatory properties. The discussion develops a system-level architecture that integrates heterogeneous biomedical knowledge, graph representation learning, recommendation ranking, expert review, and clinical translation. It then analyzes structural trade-offs involving data quality, model interpretability, computational scale, deployment latency, and sustainability. Particular attention is given to governance, fairness, robustness, and policy implications, because recommendations that influence therapeutic research priorities can amplify existing inequalities if training data, validation cohorts, and access pathways are not carefully governed. The paper concludes that graph-based drug–peptide recommendation should not be treated as a purely algorithmic pipeline but as a governed discovery infrastructure requiring transparent evidence trails, federated data stewardship, lifecycle evaluation, and equitable translation pathways. Such an infrastructure may help identify combination and repurposing opportunities that target shared aging mechanisms while preserving the flexibility needed for disease-specific clinical development.

References

1. Barabási, A.-L., & Oltvai, Z. N. (2004). Network biology: Understanding the cell's functional organization. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1272

2. Vamathevan, J., Clark, D., Czodrowski, P., Dunham, I., Ferran, E., Lee, G., Li, B., Madabhushi, A., Shah, P., Spitzer, M., & Zhao, S. (2019). Applications of machine learning in drug discovery and development. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 18(6), 463–477. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-019-0024-5

3. Zitnik, M., Agrawal, M., & Leskovec, J. (2018). Modeling polypharmacy side effects with graph convolutional networks. Bioinformatics, 34(13), i457–i466. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty294

4. Stokes, J. M., Yang, K., Swanson, K., Jin, W., Cubillos-Ruiz, A., Donghia, N. M., MacNair, C. R., French, S., Carfrae, L. A., Bloom-Ackermann, Z., Tran, V. M., Chiappino-Pepe, A., Badran, A. H., Andrews, I. W., Chory, E. J., Church, G. M., Brown, E. D., Jaakkola, T. S., Barzilay, R., & Collins, J. J. (2020). A deep learning approach to antibiotic discovery. Cell, 180(4), 688–702.e13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.01.021

5. Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., Bridgland, A., Meyer, C., Kohl, S. A. A., Ballard, A. J., Cowie, A., Romera-Paredes, B., Nikolov, S., Jain, R., Adler, J., ... Hassabis, D. (2021). Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature, 596(7873), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2

6. Senior, A. W., Evans, R., Jumper, J., Kirkpatrick, J., Sifre, L., Green, T., Qin, C., Žídek, A., Nelson, A. W. R., Bridgland, A., Denny, P., Peterson, S., Simonyan, K., Crossan, S., White, T., Glorot, X., Stringer, C., Deane, G., ... Hassabis, D. (2020). Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning. Nature, 577(7792), 706–710. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7

7. Wishart, D. S., Feunang, Y. D., Guo, A. C., Lo, E. J., Marcu, A., Grant, J. R., Sajed, T., Johnson, D., Li, C., Sayeeda, Z., Assempour, N., Iynkkaran, I., Liu, Y., Maciejewski, A., Gale, N., Wilson, A., Chin, L., Cummings, R., Le, D., ... Wilson, M. (2018). DrugBank 5.0: A major update to the DrugBank database for 2018. Nucleic Acids Research, 46(D1), D1074–D1082. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1037

8. UniProt Consortium. (2023). UniProt: The Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2023. Nucleic Acids Research, 51(D1), D523–D531. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac1052

9. Oprea, T. I., Bologa, C. G., Brunak, S., Campbell, A., Gan, G. N., Gaulton, A., Gomez, S. M., Guha, R., Hersey, A., Holmes, J., Jadhav, A., Jensen, L. J., Johnson, G. L., Karlsson, A., Leach, A. R., Ma'ayan, A., Malovannaya, A., Mani, S., Mathias, S. L., ... Zaharevitz, D. (2018). Unexplored therapeutic opportunities in the human genome. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 17(5), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2018.14

10. Hopkins, A. L. (2008). Network pharmacology: The next paradigm in drug discovery. Nature Chemical Biology, 4(11), 682–690. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.118

11. Loscalzo, J., & Barabási, A.-L. (2011). Systems biology and the future of medicine. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Systems Biology and Medicine, 3(6), 619–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsbm.144

12. Kirkwood, T. B. L. (2005). Understanding the odd science of aging. Cell, 120(4), 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.027

13. López-Otín, C., Blasco, M. A., Partridge, L., Serrano, M., & Kroemer, G. (2013). The hallmarks of aging. Cell, 153(6), 1194–1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.039

14. Kennedy, B. K., Berger, S. L., Brunet, A., Campisi, J., Cuervo, A. M., Epel, E. S., Franceschi, C., Lithgow, G. J., Morimoto, R. I., Pessin, J. E., Rando, T. A., Richardson, A., Schadt, E. E., Wyss-Coray, T., & Sierra, F. (2014). Geroscience: Linking aging to chronic disease. Cell, 159(4), 709–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.039

15. Liu, T., Song, X., Dai, X., Ma, H., Muhammad, A., He, Z., & Zhao, K. (2025). Effects of animal-derived peptides on aging-related diseases: a narrative review. Aging Advances, 2(4), 160-165.

16. Fosgerau, K., & Hoffmann, T. (2015). Peptide therapeutics: Current status and future directions. Drug Discovery Today, 20(1), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2014.10.003

17. Kaspar, A. A., & Reichert, J. M. (2013). Future directions for peptide therapeutics development. Drug Discovery Today, 18(17-18), 807–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2013.05.011

18. Muttenthaler, M., King, G. F., Adams, D. J., & Alewood, P. F. (2021). Trends in peptide drug discovery. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 20(4), 309–325. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-020-00135-8

19. Chen, H., Engkvist, O., Wang, Y., Olivecrona, M., & Blaschke, T. (2018). The rise of deep learning in drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today, 23(6), 1241–1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2018.01.039

20. Wu, Z., Ramsundar, B., Feinberg, E. N., Gomes, J., Geniesse, C., Pappu, A. S., Leswing, K., & Pande, V. (2018). MoleculeNet: A benchmark for molecular machine learning. Chemical Science, 9(2), 513–530. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7SC02664A

21. Topol, E. J. (2019). High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7

22. Rajkomar, A., Dean, J., & Kohane, I. (2019). Machine learning in medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 380(14), 1347–1358. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1814259

23. Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366(6464), 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax2342

24. Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5

25. Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., ... Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18

Downloads

Published

2026-08-21