Digital Twin-Based Optimization of Data Center Optical Interconnection Networks
Keywords:
digital twin; data center networks; optical interconnects; network optimization; sustainability; robustness; governance; fairnessAbstract
Data center optical interconnection networks are becoming central to the performance, resilience, and energy profile of large-scale digital infrastructure. As workloads diversify across artificial intelligence training, latency-sensitive inference, storage replication, and multi-tenant cloud services, static provisioning and coarse-grained traffic engineering increasingly fail to capture the dynamic coupling between physical optics, packet-level scheduling, workload placement, and facility constraints. This paper examines digital twin-based optimization of data center optical interconnection networks from a system-level perspective. It argues that digital twins can improve optical network operation not merely by simulating components, but by creating a continuously synchronized decision layer that links telemetry, physical models, workload forecasts, and policy constraints. The analysis considers architectural trade-offs among electrical switching, optical circuit switching, wavelength switching, and hybrid fabrics, with attention to observability, control latency, fault isolation, and deployment cost. It then discusses optimization loops that span physical-layer impairment estimation, topology reconfiguration, workload-aware routing, and sustainability-aware scheduling. The paper also explores governance, robustness, fairness, and policy implications, including data sovereignty, accountability for automated decisions, and equitable access to shared infrastructure. Case illustrations from hyperscale, colocation, and edge contexts show that digital twin value depends less on model fidelity alone than on institutional arrangements that determine what may be sensed, changed, and trusted. The conclusion identifies research directions for verifiable twins, multi-domain federation, and human oversight in critical optical infrastructure.
References
1. Barroso, L. A., Hölzle, U., & Ranganathan, P. (2019). The datacenter as a computer: Designing warehouse-scale machines (3rd ed.). Springer.
2. Al-Fares, M., Loukissas, A., & Vahdat, A. (2008). A scalable, commodity data center network architecture. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 38(4), 63–74.
3. Farrington, N., Porter, G., Radhakrishnan, S., Bazzaz, H. H., Subramanya, V., Fainman, Y., Papen, G., & Ford, J. (2010). Helios: A hybrid electrical/optical switch architecture for modular data centers. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 40(4), 339–350.
4. Kandula, S., Sengupta, S., Greenberg, A., Patel, P., & Chaiken, R. (2009). The nature of data center traffic: Measurements and analysis. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement (pp. 202–208). ACM.
5. Guo, C., Lu, G., Li, D., Wu, H., Zhang, X., Shi, Y., Tian, C., Zhang, Y., & Lu, S. (2009). BCube: A high performance, server-centric network architecture for modular data centers. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 39(4), 63–74.
6. Greenberg, A., Hamilton, J., Maltz, D. A., & Patel, P. (2008). The cost of a cloud: Research problems in data center networks. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 39(1), 68–73.
7. Grieves, M., & Vickers, J. (2017). Digital twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. In F.-J. Kahlen, S. Flumerfelt, & A. Alves (Eds.), Transdisciplinary perspectives on complex systems (pp. 85–113). Springer.
8. Tao, F., Zhang, H., Liu, A., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2019). Digital twin in industry: State-of-the-art. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 15(4), 2405–2415.
9. Kritzinger, W., Karner, M., Traar, G., Henjes, J., & Sihn, W. (2018). Digital twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(11), 1016–1022.
10. Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Rusu, A. A., Veness, J., Bellemare, M. G., Graves, A., Riedmiller, M., Fidjeland, A. K., Ostrovski, G., Petersen, S., Beattie, C., Sadik, A., Antonoglou, I., King, H., Kumaran, D., Wierstra, D., Legg, S., & Hassabis, D. (2015). Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature, 518(7540), 529–533.
11. Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (2018). Reinforcement learning: An introduction (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
12. Zhou, Z., Dzieciol, H., Clark, K., Luo, Y., Richardson, D., Poletti, F., ... & Liu, Z. (2023). Low-latency wavelength-switched clock-synchronized intra-data center interconnects enabled by hollow core fiber. Optics Express, 31(15), 24739-24748.
13. Cheng, Q., Bahadori, M., Glick, M., Rumley, S., & Bergman, K. (2018). Recent advances in optical technologies for data centers: A review. Optica, 5(11), 1354–1370.
14. Kachris, C., & Tomkos, I. (2012). A survey on optical interconnects for data centers. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 14(4), 1021–1036.
15. Shalf, J. (2020). The future of computing beyond Moore's Law. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 378(2166), 20190061.
16. Koomey, J., & Masanet, E. (2020). Does not compute: Avoiding pitfalls in assessing the internet's energy and carbon impacts. Joule, 4(1), 21–26.
17. Masanet, E., Shehabi, A., Lei, N., Smith, S., & Koomey, J. (2020). Recalibrating global data center energy-use estimates. Science, 367(6481), 984–986.
18. Shuja, J., Gani, A., Shamshirband, S., Ahmad, R. W., & Bilal, K. (2016). Sustainable cloud data centers: A survey of enabling techniques and technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62, 195–214.
19. DeNardis, L. (2014). The global war for internet governance. Yale University Press.
20. Lessig, L. (2006). Code: Version 2.0. Basic Books.
21. Mitchell, M., Wu, S., Zaldivar, A., Barnes, P., Vasserman, L., Hutchinson, B., Spitzer, E., Raji, I. D., & Gebru, T. (2019). Model cards for model reporting. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 220–229). ACM.
22. Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., Daumé III, H., & Crawford, K. (2021). Datasheets for datasets. Communications of the ACM, 64(12), 86–92.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Systems

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.