Reinforcement Learning-Based Post-Training Optimization for End-to-End Autonomous Driving Models

Authors

  • Pacifica Porras Department of Computer Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. Author
  • Heinz-Werner Nohlmans Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA. Author
  • Micheala Kilgallon Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. Author
  • Hendrik Bolnbach Department of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA. Author

Keywords:

end-to-end autonomous driving, reinforcement learning, post-training optimization, safety governance, socio-technical systems, deployment infrastructure

Abstract

End-to-end autonomous driving models increasingly map raw sensor observations directly to control actions, promising reduced engineering complexity and improved adaptability relative to modular pipelines. However, these models remain vulnerable to distribution shift, rare safety-critical events, and reward misalignment when deployed in open-world traffic. This paper examines reinforcement learning-based post-training as a system-level optimization layer for end-to-end driving models. It argues that post-training is not merely a model refinement technique but a socio-technical intervention that reshapes architecture, data infrastructure, validation regimes, governance, and public accountability. The discussion situates imitation-based pre-training alongside reinforcement learning fine-tuning, preference modeling, and constrained policy optimization. It analyzes structural trade-offs involving simulator fidelity, compute intensity, latency constraints, safety envelopes, and regulatory oversight. The paper further considers fairness across geographic contexts, sustainability implications of large-scale training, and policy mechanisms for staged deployment and incident reporting. A central claim is that effective post-training requires an integrated stack in which reward design, human feedback, formal safety constraints, and deployment monitoring are co-engineered. Without such integration, reinforcement learning post-training may improve aggregate performance while amplifying opaque failure modes. The paper concludes with a research agenda for auditable, resource-aware, and socially legitimate post-training pipelines for autonomous driving.

References

1. Bojarski, M., Del Testa, D., Dworakowski, D., Firner, B., Flepp, B., Goyal, P., Jackel, L. D., Monfort, M., Muller, U., Zhang, J., Zhang, X., Zhao, J., & Zieba, K. (2016). End to end learning for self-driving cars. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.07316

2. Codevilla, F., Müller, M., López, A., Koltun, V., & Dosovitskiy, A. (2018). End-to-end driving via conditional imitation learning. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (pp. 4693–4700). IEEE.

3. Dosovitskiy, A., Ros, G., Codevilla, F., López, A., & Koltun, V. (2017). CARLA: An open urban driving simulator. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on Robot Learning (pp. 1–16).

4. Kendall, A., Hawke, J., Janz, D., Mazur, P., Reda, M., Allen, J.-M., Lam, V.-D., Bewley, A., & Shah, A. (2019). Learning to drive in a day. In 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (pp. 8248–8254). IEEE.

5. Shalev-Shwartz, S., Shammah, S., & Shashua, A. (2017). On a formal model of safe and scalable self-driving cars. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.06374

6. Liang, X., Wang, T., Yang, L., & Xing, E. (2018). CIRL: Controllable imitative reinforcement learning for vision-based self-driving. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) (pp. 584–599).

7. Amini, A., Gilitschenski, I., Phillips, J., Moseyko, J., Banerjee, R., Karaman, S., & Rus, D. (2020). Learning robust control policies for end-to-end autonomous driving from data-driven simulation. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 5(2), 1143–1150.

8. Chitta, K., Prakash, A., Jaeger, B., Yu, Z., Renz, K., & Geiger, A. (2023). TransFuser: Imitation with transformer-based sensor fusion for autonomous driving. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 45(11), 12878–12895.

9. Chen, L., Wu, P., Chitta, K., Jaeger, B., Geiger, A., & Li, H. (2024). End-to-end autonomous driving: Challenges and frontiers. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 46(12), 10164–10183.

10. Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., & Klimov, O. (2017). Proximal policy optimization algorithms. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.06347

11. Yang, R., Wang, M., Chen, Y., Guo, T., Xu, Y., Cui, C., ... & Su, L. (2026). Post-Training in End-to-End Autonomous Driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.08072.

12. Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Rusu, A. A., Veness, J., Bellemare, M. G., Graves, A., Riedmiller, M., Fidjeland, A. K., Ostrovski, G., Petersen, S., Beattie, C., Sadik, A., Antonoglou, I., King, H., Kumaran, D., Wierstra, D., Legg, S., & Hassabis, D. (2015). Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature, 518(7540), 529–533.

13. Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Panneershelvam, V., Lanctot, M., Dieleman, S., Grewe, D., Nham, J., Kalchbrenner, N., Sutskever, I., Lillicrap, T., Leach, M., Kavukcuoglu, K., Graepel, T., & Hassabis, D. (2016). Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature, 529(7587), 484–489.

14. Christiano, P. F., Leike, J., Brown, T., Martic, M., Legg, S., & Amodei, D. (2017). Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 30).

15. Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Jiang, X., Almeida, D., Wainwright, C., Mishkin, P., Zhang, C., Agarwal, S., Slama, K., Ray, A., Schulman, J., Hilton, J., Kelton, F., Miller, L., Simens, M., Askell, A., Welinder, P., Christiano, P., Leike, J., & Lowe, R. (2022). Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 35, pp. 27730–27744).

16. Bai, Y., Jones, A., Ndousse, K., Askell, A., Chen, A., DasSarma, N., Drain, D., Fort, S., Ganguli, D., Henighan, T., Joseph, N., Kadavath, S., Kernion, J., Conerly, T., El-Showk, S., Elhage, N., Hatfield-Dodds, Z., Hernandez, D., ... & Kaplan, J. (2022). Training a helpful and harmless assistant with reinforcement learning from human feedback. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.05862

17. Amodei, D., Olah, C., Steinhardt, J., Christiano, P., Schulman, J., & Mané, D. (2016). Concrete problems in AI safety. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.06565

18. Russell, S. (2019). Human compatible: Artificial intelligence and the problem of control. Viking.

19. U.S. Department of Transportation. (2020). Ensuring American leadership in automated vehicle technologies: Automated vehicles 4.0. U.S. Department of Transportation.

20. SAE International. (2021). Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles (J3016_202104). SAE International.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-24