AI-Driven Detection of Cardiovascular Abnormalities from Wearable Sensor Data

Authors

  • Hugo M. Hansen Department of Computer Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA. Author
  • Juanye Sun Department of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA. Author
  • Antonio Woods Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA. Author

Keywords:

artificial intelligence; cardiovascular abnormalities; wearable sensors; digital health; machine learning; health systems

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases remain a leading cause of mortality, and wearable sensors offer continuous physiological streams that can transform detection, monitoring, and risk stratification. This paper presents an interdisciplinary systems analysis of AI-driven detection of cardiovascular abnormalities from wearable sensor data. It examines the clinical rationale, data characteristics, model architectures, and system-level trade-offs that define contemporary implementations. Rather than focusing solely on algorithmic accuracy, the analysis emphasizes infrastructure, deployment, robustness, fairness, governance, and sustainability. The discussion integrates perspectives from biomedical signal processing, distributed systems, machine learning, and health policy. Wearable data exhibit heterogeneity, motion sensitivity, and contextual noise, requiring substantial preprocessing and uncertainty management. Deep learning architectures can learn morphological and temporal patterns, but their clinical utility depends on integration with real-time infrastructure, interoperability, and rigorous prospective evaluation. Structural trade-offs include edge versus cloud processing, model complexity versus explainability, and personalization versus generalizability. Federated learning and decentralized architectures offer privacy-preserving routes for multi-institutional training. At the same time, algorithmic bias, ethical oversight, and governance remain critical concerns. The paper argues that sustainable implementations require lifecycle planning, energy-aware design, regulatory alignment, and equitable access. Forward-looking perspectives address multimodal fusion, adaptive calibration, and policy incentives for responsible deployment. Overall, the analysis frames AI-driven wearable cardiovascular detection as a socio-technical system in which reliable clinical benefit emerges from careful alignment among sensing, learning, infrastructure, and governance.

References

1. Virani, S. S., Alonso, A., Benjamin, E. J., Bittencourt, M. S., Callaway, C. W., Carson, A. P., ... & American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. (2020). Heart disease and stroke statistics—2020 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 141(9), e139–e596.

2. Piwek, L., Ellis, D. A., Andrews, S., & Joinson, A. (2016). The rise of consumer health wearables: Promises and barriers. PLOS Medicine, 13(2), e1001953.

3. Castaneda, D., Esparza, A., Ghamari, M., Soltanpur, C., & Nazeran, H. (2018). A review on wearable photoplethysmography sensors and their potential future applications in health care. International Journal of Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 4(4), 195–202.

4. Witt, D. R., Kellogg, R. A., Snyder, M. P., & Dunn, J. (2019). Windows into human health through wearables data analytics. Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering, 9, 28–46.

5. Bansal, A., & Joshi, R. (2018). Portable out-of-hospital electrocardiography: A review of current technologies. Journal of Arrhythmia, 34(2), 129–138.

6. Hannun, A. Y., Rajpurkar, P., Haghpanahi, M., Tison, G. H., Bourn, C., Turakhia, M. P., & Ng, A. Y. (2019). Cardiologist-level arrhythmia detection and classification in ambulatory electrocardiograms using a deep neural network. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 65–69.

7. Attia, Z. I., Kapa, S., Lopez-Jimenez, F., McKie, P. M., Ladewig, D. J., Satam, G., ... & Friedman, P. A. (2019). Screening for cardiac contractile dysfunction using an artificial intelligence–enabled electrocardiogram. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 70–74.

8. Perez, M. V., Mahaffey, K. W., Hedlin, H., Rumsfeld, J. S., Garcia, A., Ferris, T., ... & Turakhia, M. P. (2019). Large-scale assessment of a smartwatch to identify atrial fibrillation. New England Journal of Medicine, 381(20), 1909–1917.

9. Esteva, A., Robicquet, A., Ramsundar, B., Kuleshov, V., DePristo, M., Chou, K., ... & Dean, J. (2019). A guide to deep learning in healthcare. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 24–29.

10. Topol, E. J. (2019). High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44–56.

11. Zheng, X., Dwyer, V. M., Barrett, L. A., Derakhshani, M., & Hu, S. (2023). Rapid vital sign extraction for real-time opto-physiological monitoring at varying physical activity intensity levels. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 27(7), 3107-3118.

12. Kiranyaz, S., Ince, T., & Gabbouj, M. (2016). Real-time patient-specific ECG classification by 1-D convolutional neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 63(3), 664–675.

13. Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). "Why should I trust you?" Explaining the predictions of any classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1135–1144.

14. McMahan, H. B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & Agüera y Arcas, B. (2017). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 1273–1282.

15. Mandel, J. C., Kreda, D. A., Mandl, K. D., Kohane, I. S., & Ramoni, R. B. (2016). SMART on FHIR: A standards-based, interoperable apps platform for electronic health records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23(5), 899–908.

16. Beede, E., Baylor, E., Hersch, F., Iurchenko, A., Wilcox, L., Ruamviboonsuk, P., ... & Webster, D. R. (2020). A human-centered evaluation of a deep learning system deployed in clinics for the detection of diabetic retinopathy. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–12.

17. Rajkomar, A., Oren, E., Chen, K., Dai, A. M., Hajaj, N., Hardt, M., ... & Dean, J. (2018). Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records. npj Digital Medicine, 1, 18.

18. Rieke, N., Hancox, J., Li, W., Milletari, F., Roth, H. R., Albarqouni, S., ... & Cardoso, M. J. (2020). The future of digital health with federated learning. npj Digital Medicine, 3, 119.

19. Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366(6464), 447–453.

20. Char, D. S., Shah, N. H., & Magnus, D. (2018). Implementing machine learning in health care—addressing ethical challenges. New England Journal of Medicine, 378(11), 981–983.

21. Wiens, J., Saria, S., Sendak, M., Ghassemi, M., Liu, V. X., Doshi-Velez, F., ... & Goldenberg, A. (2019). Do no harm: A roadmap for responsible machine learning for health care. Nature Medicine, 25(9), 1337–1340.

22. World Health Organization. (2021). Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: WHO guidance. World Health Organization.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-13