Transformer-Based Modeling of Multimodal Physiological Signals for Human Activity Recognition
Keywords:
human activity recognition, multimodal physiological signals, transformer architectures, attention mechanisms, wearable systems, system governance, robustness, fairness, sustainabilityAbstract
Human activity recognition has long relied on hand-crafted features and relatively shallow classifiers applied to individual sensing modalities. The rise of deep learning created new possibilities for learning directly from time-series data, but many architectures still struggle to capture long-range dependencies, multimodal interactions, and heterogeneous sampling regimes found in physiological sensing. Transformer-based models offer a promising alternative because they can attend flexibly across temporal positions and sensor channels without being constrained by strict Markov assumptions or fixed receptive fields. This paper presents a system-level analysis of transformer-based modeling for multimodal physiological signals in human activity recognition. It examines sensing infrastructure, data governance, architectural trade-offs, training strategies, deployment constraints, robustness, fairness, and sustainability. Rather than focusing on a single algorithmic contribution, the paper discusses how multimodal physiological data from wearable, optical, electrodermal, cardiac, and inertial sensors can be organized and processed through attention mechanisms. The analysis includes structural trade-offs involving centralized and distributed learning, memory and energy budgets, cross-modal fusion order, interpretability, and regulatory compliance. Special attention is given to fairness across populations, generalization under sensor variability, and the governance of health-related inference systems. The paper argues that transformer-based activity recognition should be treated not only as a modeling problem but as a socio-technical infrastructure challenge requiring careful balancing of accuracy, resource consumption, privacy, and accountability. A forward-looking perspective is offered on the deployment of these systems in clinical, industrial, and everyday contexts.
References
1. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 5998–6008.
2. Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 4171–4186.
3. Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., Gelly, S., Uszkoreit, J., & Houlsby, N. (2021). An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Representations.
4. Zerveas, G., Jayaraman, S., Patel, D., Bhamidipaty, A., & Eickhoff, C. (2021). A transformer-based framework for multivariate time series representation learning. Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, 2114–2124.
5. Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780.
6. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444.
7. Bulling, A., Blanke, U., & Schiele, B. (2014). A tutorial on human activity recognition using body-worn inertial sensors. ACM Computing Surveys, 46(3), 1–33.
8. Ordóñez, F. J., & Roggen, D. (2016). Deep convolutional and LSTM recurrent neural networks for multimodal wearable activity recognition. Sensors, 16(1), 115.
9. Reiss, A., & Stricker, D. (2012). Introducing a new benchmarked dataset for activity recognition. Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Wearable Computers, 108–109.
10. Wang, J., Chen, Y., Hao, S., Peng, X., & Hu, L. (2019). Deep learning for sensor-based activity recognition: A survey. Pattern Recognition Letters, 119, 3–11.
11. Wen, Q., Zhou, T., Zhang, C., Chen, W., Ma, Z., Yan, J., & Sun, L. (2023). Transformers in time series: A survey. Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 6778–6786.
12. Lin, T., Wang, Y., Liu, X., & Qiu, X. (2022). A survey of transformers. AI Open, 3, 111–132.
13. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1–35.
14. Zheng, X., Hu, S., Dwyer, V., Barrett, L., & Derakhshani, M. (2026). Joint attention mechanism learning to facilitate opto-physiological monitoring during physical activity. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 113, 108949.
15. Wiens, J., Saria, S., Sendak, M., Ghassemi, M., Liu, V. X., Doshi-Velez, F., Jung, K., Heller, K., Kale, D., Saeed, M., Ossorio, P. N., Thadaney-Israni, S., & Goldenberg, A. (2019). Do no harm: A roadmap for responsible machine learning for health care. Nature Medicine, 25(9), 1337–1340.
16. Selbst, A. D., Boyd, D., Friedler, S. A., Venkatasubramanian, S., & Vertesi, J. (2019). Fairness and abstraction in sociotechnical systems. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 59–68.
17. Raji, I. D., Smart, A., White, R. N., Mitchell, M., Gebru, T., Hutchinson, B., Smith-Loud, J., Theron, D., & Barnes, P. (2020). Closing the AI accountability gap: Defining an end-to-end framework for internal algorithmic auditing. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 33–44.
18. Murad, A., & Pyun, J.-Y. (2017). Deep recurrent neural networks for human activity recognition. Sensors, 17(11), 2556.
19. Chen, Y., & Xue, Y. (2015). A deep learning approach to human activity recognition based on single accelerometer. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1488–1492.
20. Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., Avent, B., Bellet, A., Bennis, M., Bhagoji, A. N., Bonawitz, K., Charles, Z., Cormode, G., Cummings, R., D'Oliveira, R. G. L., Eichner, H., Rouayheb, S. E., Evans, D., Gardner, J., Garrett, Z., Gascón, A., Ghazi, B., Gibbons, P. B., Gruteser, M., Harchaoui, Z., He, C., He, L., Huo, Z., Hutchinson, B., Hsu, J., Jaggi, M., Javidi, T., Joshi, G., Khodak, M., Konečný, J., Korolova, A., Koushanfar, F., Koyejo, S., Lepoint, T., Liu, Y., Mittal, P., Mohri, M., Nock, R., Özgür, A., Pagh, R., Raykova, M., Qi, H., Ramage, D., Raskar, R., Song, D., Song, W., Stich, S. U., Sun, Z., Suresh, A. T., Tramèr, F., Vepakomma, P., Wang, J., Xiong, L., Xu, Z., Yang, Q., Yu, F. X., Yu, H., & Zhao, S. (2021). Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 14(1–2), 1–210.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Systems

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.