Machine Learning-Based Prediction of New Particle Formation Events from Terpene Chemistry and Anthropogenic Emission Interactions
Keywords:
new particle formation; terpene chemistry; anthropogenic emissions; machine learning; atmospheric data infrastructure; model robustness; environmental governance; socio-technical systemsAbstract
Atmospheric new particle formation is a central process connecting gas-phase chemistry, aerosol dynamics, cloud condensation nuclei abundance, and regional climate forcing. In environments influenced by both biogenic terpene emissions and anthropogenic pollutants, the formation of new particles emerges from complex chemical and physical interactions that are poorly captured by traditional deterministic parameterizations. Recent observational evidence has highlighted the importance of heavy terpenes and their modulation by anthropogenic emissions in remote high-altitude regions, yet operational prediction of such events remains an unresolved scientific and computational challenge. This article examines the design of machine learning-based prediction systems for new particle formation events with a focus on system architecture, data infrastructure, feature engineering, model selection, deployment, robustness, fairness, and policy implications. We present a system-level analysis that situates machine learning within broader atmospheric observation and modeling infrastructures, emphasizing the structural trade-offs between interpretability, data efficiency, generalization, and operational resilience. The discussion addresses the integration of ground-based aerosol and precursor observations, laboratory chamber data, satellite retrievals, emission inventories, and reanalysis fields, and considers how these heterogeneous data streams can be organized into coherent learning environments. The paper further evaluates the governance requirements for predictive systems that may inform air quality management and environmental policy, particularly across regions with uneven observational capacity. Rather than proposing a single algorithmic solution, we argue that reliable machine learning prediction for new particle formation requires a socio-technical infrastructure capable of sustaining data quality, model monitoring, uncertainty communication, and equitable scientific benefit.
References
1. Kulmala, M., Vehkamäki, H., Petäjä, T., Dal Maso, M., Lauri, A., Kerminen, V.-M., Birmili, W., & McMurry, P. H. (2004). Formation and growth rates of ultrafine atmospheric particles: A review of observations. Journal of Aerosol Science, 35(2), 143-176.
2. Bianchi, F., Tröstl, J., Junninen, H., Frege, C., Henne, S., Hoyle, C. R., ... Baltensperger, U. (2016). New particle formation in the free troposphere: A question of chemistry and timing. Science, 352(6289), 1109-1112.
3. Ehn, M., Thornton, J. A., Kleist, E., Sipilä, M., Junninen, H., Pullinen, I., ... Mentel, T. F. (2014). A large source of low-volatility secondary organic aerosol. Nature, 506(7489), 476-479.
4. Riccobono, F., Schobesberger, S., Scott, C. E., Dommen, J., Ortega, I. K., Rondo, L., ... Baltensperger, U. (2014). Oxidation products of biogenic emissions contribute to nucleation of atmospheric particles. Science, 344(6185), 717-721.
5. Liu, Y., Nie, W., Qi, X., Li, Y., Xu, T., Liu, C., ... & Ding, A. (2024). The pivotal role of heavy terpenes and anthropogenic interactions in new particle formation on the southeastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Environmental Science & Technology, 58(44), 19748.
6. Lehtipalo, K., Yan, C., Dada, L., Bianchi, F., Xiao, M., Wagner, R., ... Kulmala, M. (2018). Multicomponent new particle formation from sulfuric acid, ammonia, and biogenic vapors. Science Advances, 4(12), eaau5363.
7. Kirkby, J., Duplissy, J., Sengupta, K., Frege, C., Gordon, H., Williamson, C., ... Curtius, J. (2016). Ion-induced nucleation of pure biogenic particles. Nature, 533(7604), 521-526.
8. Jokinen, T., Berndt, T., Makkonen, R., Kerminen, V.-M., Junninen, H., Paasonen, P., ... Sipilä, M. (2015). Production of extremely low volatile organic compounds from biogenic emissions: Measured yields and atmospheric implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(23), 7123-7128.
9. Tröstl, J., Chuang, W. K., Gordon, H., Heinritzi, M., Yan, C., Molteni, U., ... Baltensperger, U. (2016). The role of low-volatility organic compounds in initial particle growth in the atmosphere. Nature, 533(7604), 527-531.
10. Zhang, R., Khalizov, A., Wang, L., Hu, M., & Xu, W. (2012). Nucleation and growth of nanoparticles in the atmosphere. Chemical Reviews, 112(3), 1957-2011.
11. Reichstein, M., Camps-Valls, G., Stevens, B., Jung, M., Denzler, J., Carvalhais, N., & Prabhat. (2019). Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science. Nature, 566(7743), 195-204.
12. Betancourt, C., Stomberg, T. T., Stadtler, S., Schultz, M. G., Roscher, R., & Wiedinmyer, C. (2021). AQ-Bench: A benchmark dataset for machine learning on global air quality. Earth System Science Data, 13(6), 3013-3040.
13. Schultz, M. G., Schröder, S., Lyapina, O., Cooper, O. R., Galbally, I., Petropavlovskikh, I., ... Ziemke, J. R. (2017). Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Database and metrics data of global surface ozone observations. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 5, 58.
14. Kulmala, M. (2018). Build a global Earth observatory. Nature, 553(7686), 21-23.
15. Guenther, A., Karl, T., Harley, P., Wiedinmyer, C., Palmer, P. I., & Geron, C. (2006). Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature). Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 6(11), 3181-3210.
16. Donahue, N. M., Kroll, J. H., Pandis, S. N., & Robinson, A. L. (2012). A two-dimensional volatility basis set—Part 2: Diagnostics of organic-aerosol evolution. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 12(2), 615-634.
17. McGovern, A., Elmore, K. L., Gagne, D. J., Haupt, S. E., Karstens, C. D., Lagerquist, R., ... Williams, J. K. (2017). Using interpretable machine learning in meteorology. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 98(10), 2115-2128.
18. Dueben, P.-D., & Bauer, P. (2018). Challenges and design choices for global weather and climate models based on machine learning. Geoscientific Model Development, 11(10), 3999-4009.
19. Chantry, M., Christensen, H., Dueben, P., & Palmer, T. (2021). Opportunities and challenges for machine learning in weather and climate modelling. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 379(2194), 20200083.
20. Holloway, T., Daigle, H., Krotkov, N. A., Strell, E., Follette-Cook, M., Wiedinmyer, C., ... Martin, R. V. (2020). Satellite monitoring for air quality and health. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 45, 327-359.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Systems

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.