Deep Learning-Based Motion Artifact Removal for Wearable Photoplethysmographic Signal Enhancement

Authors

  • Martin Patiers Department of Computer Science, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, USA. Author
  • Jordan M. Bryant Department of Computer Science, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA. Author
  • Grther Teylar Department of Computer Science, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA. Author

Keywords:

photoplethysmography; motion artifact removal; deep learning; wearable sensors; edge computing; algorithmic fairness; digital health governance

Abstract

Wearable photoplethysmography has become a central sensing modality for continuous cardiovascular monitoring, yet its practical value is constrained by motion artifacts that corrupt the underlying blood volume pulse waveform. Deep learning-based artifact removal has emerged as a promising strategy because it can learn complex mappings between corrupted and clean representations without relying solely on hand-engineered assumptions. This paper provides a system-level analysis of deep learning-based motion artifact removal for wearable photoplethysmographic signal enhancement. It examines architectural choices, training data infrastructure, model governance, deployment models, robustness, fairness, and sustainability. The discussion treats artifact removal as a sociotechnical infrastructure rather than an isolated signal processing task. It explores how convolutional, recurrent, attention-based, and encoder-decoder designs interact with the energy, memory, and latency constraints of wearable platforms. The paper also considers the governance implications of data provenance, annotation uncertainty, performance drift, and algorithmic bias. In particular, it addresses how differential optical behavior across skin pigmentation, sensor placement, and motion conditions can produce uneven performance if not explicitly managed during data collection and validation. The work argues that safe deployment requires integrating deep learning models with continuous monitoring, edge-based inference, and regulatory oversight. It further highlights the importance of multimodal sensor fusion, uncertainty estimation, and federated learning as pathways toward robust and equitable wearable cardiovascular sensing. The conclusion synthesizes these perspectives and identifies future research directions that connect signal enhancement, infrastructure governance, and clinical accountability.

References

1. Allen, J. (2007). Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physiological measurement. Physiological Measurement, 28(3), R1–R39.

2. Piwek, L., Ellis, D. A., Andrews, S., & Joinson, A. (2016). The rise of consumer health wearables: Promises and barriers. PLoS Medicine, 13(2), e1001953.

3. Ram, M. R., Madhav, K. V., Krishna, E. H., Komalla, N. R., & Reddy, K. A. (2012). A novel approach for motion artifact reduction in PPG signals based on AS-LMS adaptive filter. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 61(5), 1445–1457.

4. Raghuram, M., Madhav, K. V., Krishna, E. H., & Reddy, K. A. (2014). Evaluation of wavelets for reduction of motion artifacts in photoplethysmographic signals. In 2014 10th International Conference on Information Sciences, Signal Processing and their Applications (ISSPA) (pp. 460–463). IEEE.

5. Reiss, A., Indlekofer, I., Schmidt, P., & Van Laerhoven, K. (2019). Deep PPG: Large-scale heart rate estimation with convolutional neural networks. Sensors, 19(14), 3079.

6. Castaneda, D., Esparza, A., Ghamari, M., Soltanpur, C., & Nazeran, H. (2018). A review on wearable photoplethysmography sensors and their potential future applications in health care. International Journal of Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 4(4), 195–202.

7. Temko, A. (2017). Accurate heart rate monitoring during physical exercises using PPG. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 64(9), 2018–2025.

8. Fukushima, H., Kawanaka, H., Bhuiyan, M. S., & Oguri, K. (2012). Estimating heart rate using wrist-type photoplethysmography and acceleration sensor while running. In 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (pp. 2901–2904). IEEE.

9. Sun, B., & Zhang, Z. (2015). Photoplethysmography-based heart rate monitoring using asymmetric least squares spectrum subtraction and Bayesian decision theory. IEEE Sensors Journal, 15(12), 7161–7168.

10. Zheng, X., Dwyer, V. M., Barrett, L. A., Derakhshani, M., & Hu, S. (2022). Adaptive notch-filtration to effectively recover photoplethysmographic signals during physical activity. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 72, 103303.

11. Lee, J., Matsumura, K., Yamakoshi, K., Rolfe, P., Tanaka, S., & Yamakoshi, T. (2013). Comparison between red, green and blue light reflection photoplethysmography for heart rate monitoring during motion. In 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (pp. 1724–1727). IEEE.

12. Bonomi, A. G., Schipper, F., Eerikäinen, L. M., Margarito, J., van Dinther, R., Muesch, G., de Morree, H. M., & Aarts, R. M. (2018). Atrial fibrillation detection using a novel cardiac ambulatory monitor based on photo‐plethysmography at the wrist. Journal of the American Heart Association, 7(15), e009351.

13. Topol, E. J. (2019). High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44–56.

14. Ghassemi, M., Naumann, T., Schulam, P., Beam, A. L., Chen, I. Y., & Ranganath, R. (2020). A review of challenges and opportunities in machine learning for health care. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 107(4), 803–812.

15. Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366(6464), 447–453.

16. Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707.

17. Zhou, Z., Chen, X., Li, E., Zeng, L., Luo, K., & Zhang, J. (2019). Edge intelligence: Paving the last mile of artificial intelligence with edge computing. Proceedings of the IEEE, 107(8), 1738–1762.

18. He, J., Baxter, S. L., Xu, J., Xu, J., Zhou, X., & Zhang, K. (2019). The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 30–36.

19. World Health Organization. (2021). Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: WHO guidance. World Health Organization.

20. Sjoding, M. W., Dickson, R. P., Iwashyna, T. J., Gay, S. E., & Valley, T. S. (2020). Racial bias in pulse oximetry measurement. New England Journal of Medicine, 383(25), 2477–2478.

21. Fine, J. S., Branan, K. L., Rodriguez, A. J., Boonya-Ananta, T., Ajmal, A., Ramella-Roman, J. C., & McShane, M. J. (2021). Sources of inaccuracy in photoplethysmography for continuous cardiovascular monitoring. Biosensors, 11(4), 126.

22. Perez, M. V., Mahaffey, K. W., Hedlin, H., Rumsfeld, J. S., Garcia, A., Ferris, T., Balasubramanian, V., Russo, A. M., Rajmane, A., Cheung, L., Hung, G., Lee, J., Kowey, P., Talati, N., Nag, D., Gummidipundi, S. E., Beatty, A., Hills, M. T., Desai, S., Granger, C. B., Desai, M., & Turakhia, M. P. (2019). Large-scale assessment of a smartwatch to identify atrial fibrillation. New England Journal of Medicine, 381(20), 1909–1917.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-11