AI-Driven Digital Twins for Transportation Environments: Integrating Geospatial Scene Synthesis with VOC Exposure and Short-Term Health Risk Modeling

Authors

  • Dennis Stanley School of Information Technology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA. Author

Keywords:

AI-driven digital twins, transportation environments, geospatial scene synthesis, volatile organic compounds, health risk modeling, urban governance

Abstract

The operational complexity of urban transportation systems increasingly requires computational environments that can represent physical infrastructure, dynamic mobility flows, and environmental stressors in an integrated manner. Digital twins have emerged as promising platforms for coupling sensing, simulation, and decision support, yet many existing implementations remain fragmented across geometric reconstruction, air quality assessment, and public health analytics. This paper presents a system-level analysis of AI-driven digital twins for transportation environments, emphasizing the integration of geospatial scene synthesis with volatile organic compound exposure and short-term health risk modeling. Rather than proposing a single algorithm, the paper examines architectural trade-offs, data infrastructure requirements, model governance mechanisms, robustness conditions, fairness considerations, and deployment constraints. The discussion develops a layered conceptual architecture in which generative geospatial scene synthesis supplies microenvironmental context, while exposure models translate pollutant concentrations into health-relevant indicators across transit modes. Particular attention is given to the challenges of synchronizing heterogeneous data streams, managing uncertainty in AI-generated scene representations, and ensuring that health risk outputs remain interpretable for public agencies. The paper further addresses policy implications related to air quality management, transit ventilation improvements, and the equitable distribution of environmental information. It argues that the value of such digital twins lies not primarily in predictive precision alone, but in their capacity to link spatial representation, environmental monitoring, and health governance within a transparent and maintainable socio-technical system.

References

1. Batty, M. (2018). Digital twins. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 45(5), 817–820. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808318796416

2. Fuller, A., Fan, Z., Day, C., & Barlow, C. (2020). Digital twin: Enabling technologies, challenges and open research. IEEE Access, 8, 108952–108971. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2998358

3. Tao, F., Zhang, H., Liu, A., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2019). Digital twin in industry: State-of-the-art. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 15(4), 2405–2415. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2018.2873186

4. Ketzler, B., Naserentin, V., Latino, F., Zangelidis, C., Thuvander, L., & Logg, A. (2020). Digital twins for cities: A state of the art review. Built Environment, 46(4), 547–573. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.46.4.547

5. White, G., Zink, A., Codecá, L., & Clarke, S. (2021). A digital twin smart city for citizen feedback. Cities, 110, 103064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.103064

6. Dembski, F., Wössner, U., Letzgus, M., Ruddat, M., & Yamu, C. (2020). Urban digital twins for smart cities and citizen participation: A case study. Sustainability, 12(17), 6907. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176907

7. Biljecki, F., Stoter, J., Ledoux, H., Zlatanova, S., & Çöltekin, A. (2015). Applications of 3D city models: State of the art review. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 4(4), 2842–2889. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi4042842

8. Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y

9. Zheng, Y., Capra, L., Wolfson, O., & Yang, H. (2014). Urban computing: Concepts, methodologies, and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 5(3), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1145/2629592

10. Kitchin, R. (2014). The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, 79(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8

11. Xiong, Z., Xing, X., Workman, S., Khanal, S., & Jacobs, N. (2024). Mixed-view panorama synthesis using geospatially guided diffusion. Transactions on Machine Learning Research.

12. Wang, Z., Zhang, X., Wang, L., Fu, S., Wu, J., Xiong, J., & Huang, S. (2024). Concentrations and short-term health effects of VOCs in explored subway, bus and taxi in Beijing, China. Atmospheric Environment, 339, 120855.

13. Cincinelli, A., & Martellini, T. (2017). Indoor air quality and health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(11), 1286. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14111286

14. Hoek, G., Krishnan, R. M., Beelen, R., Peters, A., Ostro, B., Brunekreef, B., & Kaufman, J. D. (2013). Long-term air pollution exposure and cardio-respiratory mortality: A review. Environmental Health, 12, 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-12-43

15. Sacks, J. D., Lloyd, J. M., Zhu, Y., Andres, J., Miller, C. A., & Fann, N. (2018). The Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program – Community Edition (BenMAP-CE): A tool to estimate health impacts of air pollution. Environmental Modelling & Software, 104, 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.02.009

16. Niederer, S. A., Sacks, M. S., Girolami, M., & Willcox, K. (2021). Scaling digital twins from the artisanal to the industrial. Nature Computational Science, 1(5), 313–320. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-021-00072-5

17. Rasheed, A., San, O., & Kvamsdal, T. (2020). Digital twin: Values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective. IEEE Access, 8, 21980–22012. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2970143

18. Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 2053951716679679. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679

19. Aheleroff, S., Xu, X., Zhong, R. Y., & Lu, Y. (2021). Digital twin as a service (DTaaS) in Industry 4.0: An architecture reference model. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 47, 101225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101225

20. Shahat, E., Hyun, C. T., & Yeom, C. (2021). City digital twin potentials: A review and research agenda. Sustainability, 13(6), 3386. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063386

21. Rohde, R. A., & Muller, R. A. (2015). Air pollution in China: Mapping of concentrations and sources. PLoS ONE, 10(8), e0135749. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135749

22. World Health Organization. (2021). WHO global air quality guidelines: Particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide. World Health Organization.

23. Raes, L., Michiels, P., Adolphi, T., Tampere, C., Dalianis, A., McAleer, S., & Kogut, P. (2022). DUET: A framework for building interoperable and trusted digital twins of smart cities. IEEE Internet Computing, 26(3), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2021.3060962

24. O'Dwyer, E., Pan, I., Acha, S., & Shah, N. (2019). Smart energy systems for sustainable smart cities: Current developments, trends and future directions. Applied Energy, 237, 581–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.024

Downloads

Published

2026-08-18