Event-Triggered Tube Model Predictive Control for Robust Vehicle Motion Tracking Under Uncertain Dynamics and External Disturbances
Keywords:
event-triggered control, tube model predictive control, robust vehicle motion tracking, uncertain dynamics, external disturbances, real-time control systems, safety assurance, infrastructure governanceAbstract
The deployment of autonomous and semi-autonomous ground vehicles places exacting demands on motion tracking systems that must operate in uncertain environments, under changing vehicle dynamics, and in the presence of external disturbances such as crosswinds, road surface irregularities, and sensor degradation. This paper presents a system-level analysis of event-triggered tube model predictive control as an architectural framework for robust vehicle motion tracking. Rather than focusing exclusively on algorithmic formulations, the discussion addresses the coupling between predictive control structures, disturbance compensation, computational resource allocation, communication infrastructure, and safety governance. The event-triggered mechanism is examined as a means of reducing computational and communicative load while preserving robustness through tube-based uncertainty propagation. The paper further considers structural trade-offs involving prediction horizon length, triggering thresholds, state constraint tightening, and real-time solver performance. Infrastructure implications for embedded deployment, failure handling, and lifecycle sustainability are analyzed alongside cross-domain comparisons with networked control and large-scale data-driven systems. The analysis shows that event-triggered tube model predictive control offers a principled path toward balancing robust constraint satisfaction with practical resource limitations. However, its successful deployment depends on governance mechanisms, validation procedures, and lifecycle management that extend beyond the control law itself. The paper contributes a synthetic interdisciplinary perspective intended to inform both engineering design and institutional decision-making for robust autonomous vehicle control.
References
1. Mayne, D. Q., Rawlings, J. B., Rao, C. V., & Scokaert, P. O. M. (2000). Constrained model predictive control: Stability and optimality. Automatica, 36(6), 789–814.
2. Rawlings, J. B., Mayne, D. Q., & Diehl, M. M. (2017). Model predictive control: Theory, computation, and design (2nd ed.). Nob Hill Publishing.
3. Langson, W., Chryssochoos, I., Raković, S. V., & Mayne, D. Q. (2004). Robust model predictive control using tubes. Automatica, 40(1), 125–133.
4. Tabuada, P. (2007). Event-triggered real-time scheduling of stabilizing control tasks. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 52(9), 1680–1685.
5. Heemels, W. P. M. H., Johansson, K. H., & Tabuada, P. (2012). An introduction to event-triggered and self-triggered control. In Proceedings of the 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 3270–3285.
6. Zhang, C., Zhang, H., Qiao, J., Yuan, D., & Zhang, M. (2019). Deep transfer learning for intelligent cellular traffic prediction based on cross-domain big data. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 37(6), 1389-1401.
7. Falcone, P., Borrelli, F., Asgari, J., Tseng, H. E., & Hrovat, D. (2007). Predictive active steering control for autonomous vehicle systems. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 15(3), 566–580.
8. Gao, Y., Gray, A., Tseng, H. E., & Borrelli, F. (2014). A tube-based robust nonlinear predictive control approach to semiautonomous ground vehicles. Vehicle System Dynamics, 52(6), 802–823.
9. Paden, B., Čáp, M., Yong, S. Z., Yershov, D., & Frazzoli, E. (2016). A survey of motion planning and control techniques for self-driving urban vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 1(1), 33–55.
10. Althoff, M., & Dolan, J. M. (2014). Online verification of automated road vehicles using reachability analysis. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 30(4), 903–918.
11. Åström, K. J., & Wittenmark, B. (2013). Computer-controlled systems: Theory and design (3rd ed.). Dover Publications.
12. Maciejowski, J. M. (2002). Predictive control with constraints. Prentice Hall.
13. Mattingley, J., Wang, Y., & Boyd, S. (2011). Receding horizon control: Automatic generation of high-speed solvers. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 31(3), 52–65.
14. Domahidi, A., Zgraggen, A. U., Zeilinger, M. N., Morari, M., & Jones, C. N. (2012). Efficient interior point methods for multistage problems arising in receding horizon control. In 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 668–674.
15. Chisci, L., Rossiter, J. A., & Zappa, G. (2001). Systems with persistent disturbances: Predictive control with restricted constraints. Automatica, 37(7), 1019–1028.
16. Hewing, L., Wabersich, K. P., Menner, M., & Zeilinger, M. N. (2020). Learning-based model predictive control: Toward safe learning in control. Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, 3, 269–296.
17. Ames, A. D., Coogan, S., Egerstedt, M., Notomista, G., Sreenath, K., & Tabuada, P. (2019). Control barrier functions: Theory and applications. In 2019 18th European Control Conference (ECC), 3420–3431.
18. Cai, G., Huang, C., Feng, J., Zhou, Y., & Yin, G. (2026). Real-Time Event-Triggered Tube MPC With ISS Guarantees for Vehicle Motion Control Under Disturbances. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.
19. Kurzhanski, A. B., & Varaiya, P. (2000). Ellipsoidal techniques for reachability analysis: Part I: External approximations. In Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control, LNCS 1790, 202–214. Springer.
20. Sontag, E. D. (2008). Input to state stability: Basic concepts and results. In Nonlinear and Optimal Control Theory, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1932, 163–220. Springer.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Systems

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.