Cross-Lingual Singing Representation Learning for Semantic Music Retrieval

Authors

  • Blessandro A. Gamirez Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA. Author
  • Ceorge Bage Department of Computer Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. Author
  • Gaul Rerry Department of Computer Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. Author
  • Jesper Perez Department of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA. Author

Keywords:

cross-lingual representation learning; singing voice; semantic music retrieval; music information retrieval; audio embeddings; fairness in music systems; multimodal learning

Abstract

Semantic music retrieval remains a difficult systems problem because musical meaning arises from interacting linguistic, acoustic, stylistic, and cultural signals that are not easily captured by conventional metadata search. This paper examines cross-lingual singing representation learning as a foundation for semantic retrieval across languages, genres, and vocal traditions. We argue that effective retrieval requires representations that separate language-specific surface variation from deeper melodic, rhythmic, and expressive invariants while preserving culturally meaningful differences. Drawing on advances in representation learning, self-supervised speech modeling, and music information retrieval, the paper develops a system-level framework in which multilingual singing encoders produce shared embeddings that can be indexed and queried through multiple modalities. The analysis focuses on structural trade-offs among encoder architectures, multimodal alignment strategies, retrieval indexing, deployment infrastructure, and evaluation protocols. Special attention is given to fairness, governance, and sustainability because cross-lingual systems can easily amplify dominant languages and commercial genres while marginalizing minority singing traditions. The paper also examines hidden technical debt, dataset documentation, and policy considerations for large-scale music retrieval infrastructures. By integrating these perspectives, the study offers a comprehensive research agenda for building robust, equitable, and semantically grounded singing voice retrieval systems.

References

1. Bengio, Y., Courville, A., & Vincent, P. (2013). Representation learning: A review and new perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 35(8), 1798-1828.

2. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., ... & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30.

3. van den Oord, A., Dieleman, S., Zen, H., Simonyan, K., Vinyals, O., Graves, A., ... & Kavukcuoglu, K. (2016). WaveNet: A generative model for raw audio. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.03499.

4. Choi, K., Fazekas, G., Sandler, M., & Cho, K. (2017). Convolutional recurrent neural networks for music classification. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) (pp. 2392-2396). IEEE.

5. Zhang, Y., Pan, C., Guo, W., Li, R., Zhu, Z., Wang, J., ... & Zhao, Z. (2024). Gtsinger: A global multi-technique singing corpus with realistic music scores for all singing tasks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37, 1117-1140.

6. Müller, M. (2015). Fundamentals of Music Processing: Audio, Analysis, Algorithms, Applications. Springer.

7. McFee, B., Raffel, C., Liang, D., Ellis, D. P. W., McVicar, M., Battenberg, E., & Nieto, O. (2015). librosa: Audio and music signal analysis in Python. In Proceedings of the 14th Python in Science Conference (pp. 18-25).

8. Baevski, A., Zhou, Y., Mohamed, A., & Auli, M. (2020). wav2vec 2.0: A framework for self-supervised learning of speech representations. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 12449-12460.

9. Hsu, W. N., Bolte, B., Tsai, Y. H. H., Lakhotia, K., Salakhutdinov, R., & Mohamed, A. (2021). HuBERT: Self-supervised speech representation learning by masked prediction of hidden units. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 29, 3451-3460.

10. Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Xu, T., Brockman, G., McLeavey, C., & Sutskever, I. (2023). Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak supervision. In International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 28492-28518). PMLR.

11. Hershey, S., Chaudhuri, S., Ellis, D. P. W., Gemmeke, J. F., Jansen, A., Moore, R. C., ... & Wilson, K. W. (2017). CNN architectures for large-scale audio classification. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) (pp. 131-135). IEEE.

12. Raffel, C., Shazeer, N., Roberts, A., Lee, K., Narang, S., Matena, M., ... & Liu, P. J. (2020). Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(140), 1-67.

13. Conneau, A., Khandelwal, K., Goyal, N., Chaudhary, V., Wenzek, G., Guzmán, F., ... & Stoyanov, V. (2020). Unsupervised cross-lingual representation learning at scale. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 8440-8451).

14. Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 610-623).

15. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1-35.

16. Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., Daumé III, H., & Crawford, K. (2021). Datasheets for datasets. Communications of the ACM, 64(12), 86-92.

17. Sculley, D., Holt, G., Golovin, D., Davydov, E., Phillips, T., Ebner, D., ... & Dennison, D. (2015). Hidden technical debt in machine learning systems. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 28.

18. Schedl, M., Zamani, H., Chen, C. W., Deldjoo, Y., & Elahi, M. (2018). Current challenges and visions in music recommender systems research. International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval, 7(2), 95-116.

19. Sturm, B. L., Ben-Tal, O., Monaghan, Ú., Collins, N., Herremans, D., Chew, E., ... & Pardo, B. (2019). Machine learning research that matters for music creation: A case study. Journal of New Music Research, 48(1), 36-55.

20. Meseguer-Brocal, G., Cohen-Hadria, A., & Peeters, G. (2018). DALI: A large dataset of synchronized audio, lyrics and notes, automatically created using teacher-student machine learning paradigm. In Proceedings of the 19th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (pp. 431-437).

Downloads

Published

2026-08-14